Free accessible practice · about ten minutes
Use a second AI to challenge the work.
A polished answer can still be wrong. This brief helps you find the risks that matter before someone else receives the work, while the final decision stays with you.
1. Give the reviewer the right context
- 1.
Original ask. Paste exactly what you asked the first AI to produce.
- 2.
Finished result. Paste the exact version a person will receive, not a summary.
- 3.
Rules. List the audience, facts, tone, format, permissions, and non-negotiables.
2. Copy the review prompt
Act as an independent reviewer. Another AI created the work below. Do not assume it is correct because it sounds polished. Tell me what is unclear, inaccurate, unsupported, missing, repetitive, or out of step with my instructions. List the three most important problems first. For each one, quote the exact passage, explain the problem in plain language, and suggest a specific fix. Tell me what is working and should stay. If you cannot verify something, say so instead of guessing.
3. Check the review before you trust it
Evidence
Can it quote the exact problem and support the claim?
Context
Does the finding matter for the person receiving the work?
Decision
What will you keep, change, reject, or mark unknown?
4. Make the decision yours
- Keep
- What is already working and should stay?
- Change
- What will you revise before the work leaves your hands?
- Verify
- What still needs a source, a person, or an honest “unknown”?
The second model is a reviewer, not the final authority. If the work involves legal, medical, financial, employment, or other high-stakes decisions, use qualified human review.